Skip to main content
Safety Solutions TrainingSafety Solutions Training

Recording and livestreaming

When staff are recorded at work or livestreamed

Frontline employees may be recorded during home visits, inspections, reception duties, telephone calls and other public-facing work.

Recording is no longer limited to someone holding up a mobile phone. Doorbell cameras, smart speakers, baby monitors, indoor security cameras, smart glasses, watches and other connected devices may capture or transmit conversations and images.

Sometimes recording is routine or intended to document an interaction. At other times, it may be used to provoke, intimidate or target an employee.

Photographs, audio and video can also be edited, taken out of context or altered using artificial intelligence (AI).

This guide explains the risks, how staff can respond professionally, how to protect confidential information and what employers should do when recording becomes a safety concern.

A person holding a phone up towards a woman in a high-visibility jacket

Who This Guidance Is For

This guidance is for employees, managers and employers whose work involves contact with residents, tenants, customers, patients, service users or members of the public.

It is particularly relevant to housing associations, local authorities, healthcare, social care, charities, enforcement services, reception teams and employees who visit people's homes.

Employees may encounter recording equipment during entirely routine work. The presence of a device does not automatically mean they are being recorded or deliberately monitored.

Staff should understand the possibilities without feeling they must identify every device or determine whether recording is taking place.

Employers should provide clear procedures for managing confidentiality, responding to intimidation and obtaining assistance.

What This Guide Covers

This guide explains:

  • Filming with mobile phones and tablets.
  • Doorbell cameras and household CCTV.
  • Indoor security cameras, baby monitors and pet cameras.
  • Smart speakers, including Amazon Alexa devices.
  • Smart glasses, including Ray-Ban Meta glasses.
  • Smartwatches and other wearable recording devices.
  • Phones left in rooms to record or transmit conversations.
  • Remote listening features and connected microphones.
  • Hidden audio and video recording.
  • Livestreaming and deliberate attempts to provoke employees.
  • AI-altered photographs, audio and video.
  • Protecting confidential information and personal details.
  • Responding when filming or recording becomes intimidating.
  • Reporting incidents, preserving evidence and receiving management support.

This guide concerns employees being recorded or monitored by other people.

For employer-issued cameras, see Body-Worn Cameras at Work.

For online publication, digital footprints, threats and harassment, see Protecting Staff from Online Targeting and Harassment.

Preparing Staff Who May Be Recorded

Employers should consider recording risks within home-visit procedures, reception guidance, lone worker risk assessments, confidentiality policies and conflict management training.

Employees should not be expected to identify every recording device, challenge a resident about technology or resolve complicated legal questions during a visit.

The most useful preparation is understanding how to protect confidential information, maintain professional communication and respond safely when recording becomes a concern.

Before a Visit

Check whether there is any relevant history of threatening filming, unwanted online publication, harassment or previous confidentiality concerns.

Decide whether the visit can proceed safely and whether additional support is needed.

Consider whether confidential discussions should take place in another setting.

During the Visit

Assume that the conversation could be overheard or recorded, without assuming that every device is actively listening.

Remain professional and avoid discussing sensitive information where other people or recording equipment may compromise confidentiality.

If the setting is unsuitable, explain the concern and arrange another appropriate way to continue.

If Recording Becomes Intimidating

Pause the conversation and assess the situation.

Avoid arguments about the person's device.

Explain an appropriate boundary, contact a manager or withdraw when necessary.

Do not remain in an unsafe situation simply because the visit was scheduled.

After the Visit

Record relevant facts, including any threats, suspected recording, disclosure of confidential information or attempts to intimidate the employee.

Report concerns through the organisation's procedures.

Managers should consider whether the employee needs further support or changes to future visiting arrangements.

Important

Employees must not seize, damage, disable or interfere with someone's equipment.

They should not search a home for recording devices or attempt to access another person's phone or account.

The priority is safety, confidentiality and appropriate reporting.

Why People May Record

Not everyone who records an employee is attempting to cause a problem.

Understanding the possible reasons helps staff respond proportionately.

Routine Home Security

Doorbell cameras, baby monitors and pet cameras may be used to monitor a property, protect belongings or check on children and animals.

Staff may appear in recordings simply because they are carrying out their normal duties.

Personal Records

A resident or service user may want a record of a discussion, complaint, visit or decision.

Accountability

Someone may record an interaction because they want evidence of how they were treated or how an organisation responded.

Remote Communication

Some connected devices allow household members to hear or see what is happening from another location.

This may be an ordinary household arrangement rather than an attempt to monitor employees.

Provocation

Some people may record staff hoping to capture an angry or inappropriate reaction for publication online.

Remaining professional and avoiding unnecessary confrontation are particularly important.

Intimidation or Targeting

Recording may sometimes be accompanied by threats, unwanted personal questions, repeated filming or attempts to identify employees outside work.

Managers should consider the behaviour and the wider circumstances rather than the presence of a camera alone.

The important issue is whether the circumstances create a confidentiality, safeguarding or personal safety concern that requires action.

Modern Recording and Listening Devices

Employees may encounter devices capable of capturing sound, images or video without recognising them as recording equipment.

The following examples explain what staff may come across and why the technology matters.

A device's presence does not prove that recording or listening is taking place. Features differ between products and depend on configuration, permissions and the way the equipment is being used.

Doorbell Cameras and Household CCTV

Video doorbells and security cameras may record people approaching a property.

Some also allow the owner to watch a live feed or communicate remotely.

A housing officer could be recorded approaching the door, reading an identification badge, speaking to the resident or returning to their vehicle.

Employees should avoid discussing confidential information on the doorstep where the surroundings are unsuitable.

Managers should also consider whether full names on badges unnecessarily expose staff identities.

Baby Monitors

Modern baby monitors may contain cameras, microphones, speakers and wireless connections.

Some allow a parent or another authorised user to view or hear what is happening from another room or remotely through an application.

A member of staff speaking inside a property should be aware that a baby monitor could capture part of the conversation.

This does not mean the resident is deliberately recording or monitoring them.

Where a confidential discussion is needed, consider whether another setting would be more appropriate.

Pet Cameras and Dog Cameras

Indoor pet cameras, sometimes described as dog cameras, may allow owners to see and hear what happens at home while they are away.

Some models include motion alerts, microphones, speakers or recording functions.

For housing officers, repairs staff and other employees visiting properties, these devices may be positioned in living rooms, kitchens or hallways.

A conversation held near the camera may be audible to someone accessing the device.

Do not attempt to cover or disconnect the equipment. If confidentiality is a concern, explain why another arrangement may be necessary.

Amazon Alexa and Other Smart Speakers

Smart speakers such as Amazon Echo devices can respond to voice commands and provide other connected services.

Some supported Alexa devices offer an optional feature called 'Drop In', which allows an authorised connection for two-way communication.

When enabled and configured, this can allow someone to hear or communicate through a compatible device from another location.

A smart speaker in a resident's home does not mean someone is automatically recording or listening to the employee.

Nevertheless, staff should be mindful that connected devices may have communication or audio functions.

Avoid discussing confidential information where the circumstances are unsuitable.

Smart Glasses, Including Meta Glasses

Some smart glasses look similar to ordinary spectacles but contain cameras and microphones.

Ray-Ban Meta glasses, for example, can capture photographs and video using compatible functions.

Their camera capture system includes an indicator light, although employees should not rely on noticing a light to determine whether recording is occurring.

A person wearing smart glasses may be able to capture an interaction without holding a telephone in front of them.

Employees should remain professional and follow the same boundaries used when someone is visibly filming.

Do not demand that someone remove their glasses simply because the frames may contain technology. Assess the actual behaviour and circumstances.

Smartwatches and Wearable Recorders

Some smartwatches can record audio through voice memo applications.

Other wearable devices may include microphones, cameras or connected communication features.

A person does not necessarily need to hold a phone to make an audio recording.

Employees should not assume that every smartwatch is recording.

If confidential information is at risk, explain why the conversation needs to take place in a suitable setting.

Mobile Phones Left in a Room

A mobile phone may be left on a table, shelf or elsewhere during a conversation.

It may simply have been put down, but phones also have applications capable of recording sound or transmitting audio.

A person could leave a phone in a room while a recording application is running.

Employees should not search, pick up or interfere with the device.

Where a confidential discussion cannot safely or appropriately continue, arrange another method of communication.

Remote Listening Through a Mobile Phone

Some accessibility features allow a mobile phone to act as a microphone and send sound to compatible headphones or hearing devices.

Apple's 'Live Listen' feature is one example.

This feature can transmit nearby sound to an authorised listening device. It does not, by itself, create a saved audio recording.

Separate applications may offer audio recording or other communication functions.

These technologies can have entirely legitimate uses, including supporting people with hearing difficulties.

Staff should avoid making assumptions about why someone is using them.

The practical response remains to protect confidential information and raise genuine concerns appropriately.

Hidden Cameras and Audio Recorders

Small recording devices may be concealed within everyday objects or used without drawing attention.

Employees should not be expected to search for hidden equipment during home visits.

Maintaining appropriate professional communication and following confidentiality procedures are more practical safeguards.

If there is credible information suggesting deliberate covert recording or intimidation, report it to a manager.

Do not confront someone or search their property.

Recording Telephone Calls

Telephone conversations may be recorded by organisations or by callers using a range of devices and applications.

Some callers may place a second device near a phone or use an available recording function.

Employees should follow their organisation's call-handling procedures, avoid unnecessary disclosure of personal information and record threats or abuse appropriately.

The possibility of recording does not mean staff should refuse ordinary customer enquiries.

Livestreaming

Livestreaming allows video or audio to be transmitted to an online audience as events happen.

Staff may not know who is watching, whether the material is being saved or whether short extracts will later be shared.

If an employee is being livestreamed, they should remain professional, protect confidential information and assess whether the interaction can safely continue.

Threatening behaviour, deliberate provocation or attempts to expose personal details should be reported.

The objective is awareness, not suspicion.

Staff do not need detailed technical knowledge of every device. They need to understand the possibilities, protect confidential information, recognise intimidation and know when to seek support.

What to Do If You Suspect Recording

Employees do not need proof of recording before protecting confidential information or reporting a genuine concern.

If you notice or suspect recording:

  • Remain calm and professional.
  • Avoid arguing about the equipment.
  • Do not assume that every device is being used to monitor you.
  • Protect confidential and safeguarding information.
  • Consider whether the setting is appropriate for the conversation.
  • Explain an appropriate boundary if necessary.
  • Contact your manager where support is needed.
  • Withdraw if the situation becomes unsafe.

Do not seize, disable, cover or damage recording equipment.

If You Notice a Camera or Smart Device

I appreciate that you have recording equipment in your home. I need to make sure we can discuss your information appropriately. If necessary, we can arrange another way to continue.

If Someone Is Deliberately Filming You

I understand you may wish to record this conversation. I am happy to explain the organisation's position, but we need to keep the discussion professional.

If Confidentiality Is a Concern

This discussion involves confidential information. I would prefer to continue somewhere more appropriate or arrange another way to speak with you.

If the Behaviour Becomes Threatening

I am not comfortable continuing while this behaviour is taking place. I am ending the visit and will report my concerns.

These are examples, not compulsory scripts.

Employees should follow organisational procedures and adapt their communication to the circumstances.

Where continuing would be unsafe, withdrawing takes priority over explaining recording arrangements.

AI-Altered Photographs, Audio and Video

Photographs and recordings can now be changed using widely available editing tools and artificial intelligence.

An image or video shared online may not accurately represent what happened.

The ability to manipulate material creates additional risks for employees whose work involves conflict, complaints, enforcement or difficult decisions.

Altered Photographs

A genuine photograph of a member of staff may be edited to change their facial expression, clothing, surroundings or apparent behaviour.

AI tools may also create a convincing image showing an employee in a situation that never occurred.

For example, a photograph of a housing officer taken during an ordinary visit could be altered to suggest that the officer was behaving aggressively or acting inappropriately.

Edited Video and Missing Context

A short clip may show an employee responding firmly to someone without showing the earlier abuse, threats or behaviour that led to the response.

Video may also be rearranged, altered or combined with other material.

A recording should not automatically be treated as a complete or reliable account of an incident.

AI-Generated Voices and Audio

Technology can generate speech that sounds similar to a real person's voice.

An audio clip could falsely suggest that an employee made an offensive remark, threat or admission.

Managers should take particular care where the original recording is unavailable or the source cannot be established.

False Captions and Misleading Claims

A genuine photograph or video may be published alongside a false description.

A caption could identify the wrong employee, misrepresent the purpose of a visit or encourage hostility towards someone.

Even where the image itself has not been altered, misleading information may cause serious problems.

Impersonation and Fake Accounts

Someone may create a social media account using an employee's name, photograph or other identifying information.

The account may then be used to make misleading statements, contact other people or damage the employee's reputation.

Report suspected impersonation promptly.

What Employees Should Do

If you discover an altered photograph, suspicious recording or false material about yourself:

  • Tell your manager promptly.
  • Preserve the URL, publication date and relevant screenshots.
  • Do not argue with the person responsible through personal accounts.
  • Do not attempt to prove authenticity by publicly sharing confidential work information.
  • Report threats, impersonation or exposure of personal details.
  • Ask for appropriate support if the incident affects your safety or wellbeing.

What Managers Should Do

Do not assume an online photograph, video or audio clip proves what happened.

Preserve the available material and establish its source.

Consider whether an original recording, full conversation, incident report, witness account or other independent evidence is available.

Avoid making disciplinary or other serious decisions based only on an unverified online clip.

Where material appears manipulated or creates threats, harassment or reputational harm, seek appropriate specialist advice.

The practical lesson is that material can be misleading even when it looks convincing.

Employees should continue to record incidents accurately, and organisations should investigate concerns fairly and carefully.

See Protecting Staff from Online Targeting and Harassment and the incident evidence and reporting guide.

Professional Boundaries and Staff Identification

Employees should maintain professional standards whether or not they believe they are being recorded.

Avoid inappropriate comments about residents, service users or colleagues.

Do not use personal social media accounts to discuss work matters or contact clients outside approved arrangements.

Do not share private contact details, family information or confidential work records.

Name Badges and Staff Identifiers

A recording may reveal an employee's surname, job title or staff identification details.

Employers should consider whether displaying full names is necessary for particular frontline roles.

Where appropriate, a first name and dedicated public-facing staff reference may provide sufficient accountability without routinely disclosing the employee's surname.

This is a risk-based option, not a general legal requirement.

An actual payroll number should not automatically be used as a public identifier.

Other Information That May Be Captured

Recordings may show vehicles, registration numbers, uniforms, office locations or correspondence containing employees' names.

Organisations should consider whether these details create unnecessary exposure when combined with information available online.

The Employer's Responsibility

Employees can take sensible precautions, but employers should not leave the entire responsibility for preventing harassment and online targeting to individual staff.

Organisational procedures should address unnecessary disclosure of personal information and provide a way for staff to report concerns.

See Professional Boundaries and Protecting Staff from Online Targeting and Harassment.

What Managers Should Do

When an employee reports recording, intimidation, unwanted publication or suspected manipulation of an image, managers should take the concern seriously.

The presence of recording equipment does not automatically establish wrongdoing. Managers should consider what happened and whether the employee faced a genuine safety, confidentiality or harassment risk.

Immediate Response

  • Check the employee's immediate safety and welfare.
  • Record the circumstances and any threatening behaviour.
  • Identify whether confidential information may have been captured.
  • Consider whether the employee was identifiable through a badge, uniform or other visible details.
  • Preserve relevant evidence using approved procedures.
  • Check whether there have been previous incidents or online targeting.
  • Consider whether future visits or contact arrangements need changing.
  • Involve safeguarding, HR, information governance, security or police as appropriate.

If Smart Devices Are Involved

Establish what the employee actually observed or was told.

Do not assume that a device was recording simply because it has that capability.

Avoid asking staff to investigate household devices or obtain access to private accounts.

Assess whether confidentiality was compromised and whether further enquiries are necessary.

If AI-Altered Material Is Published

Preserve the published material and establish whether the original photograph, video or audio is available.

Avoid relying on the online version alone to reach conclusions about an employee's conduct.

Consider the risks of impersonation, threats and the disclosure of staff information.

Coordinate the organisational response and support the employee.

Reviewing Workplace Procedures

Review whether policies adequately address mobile filming, indoor cameras, smart speakers, wearable recording devices and online publication.

Employees should receive proportionate practical guidance, without being expected to become technology specialists.

Review staff identification arrangements, confidentiality procedures and the support available after incidents.

Supporting Staff

An employee may be distressed by the possibility that a difficult encounter was recorded or shared with others.

This concern may become more serious if their full name, photograph or family details appear online.

Explain what support is available and agree the appropriate next steps.

Do not leave employees to confront an uploader or defend themselves on social media.

What Employers Should Do When Recordings Are Shared Online

Employees may discover that footage of them carrying out their duties has been uploaded to Facebook, TikTok, Instagram, YouTube or another online platform.

The recording may show a legitimate interaction, a disagreement, a complaint or an incident involving threatening behaviour.

Some recordings may be edited, taken out of context or accompanied by misleading allegations. Others may reveal an employee's name, workplace, vehicle, home address or other personal information.

Artificial intelligence can also be used to alter images, voices or video footage, making it appear that someone said or did something that never happened.

Not every recording or online publication is unlawful. People may have legitimate reasons to record interactions or share criticism.

However, employers must take appropriate action where publication creates a foreseeable risk to employee safety, involves suspected criminal conduct or exposes employees to harassment, threats or intimidation.

The following procedure provides a practical starting point.

Step 1: Protect the Employee

The employee should inform their manager immediately and should not contact the person responsible for uploading the material.

Employees should not:

  • Reply to threatening or abusive comments.
  • Argue with the uploader.
  • Post their own response on social media.
  • Contact the uploader through private messages.
  • Ask friends or colleagues to challenge the person online.
  • Share or repost the material unnecessarily.

Managers should assess whether the employee is at immediate risk.

Consider whether the publication reveals their home address, personal telephone number, family details, working location or movements.

Where necessary, review planned home visits, lone working arrangements, workplace security and other relevant safety measures.

If there is an immediate threat to life or safety, contact the police using the appropriate emergency number.

Step 2: Preserve the Evidence

Before requesting removal, preserve available evidence where it is safe and lawful to do so.

This may include:

  • Screenshots of the original post.
  • The full website address or direct link.
  • The account name and profile address.
  • The date and time the material was discovered.
  • The original video or image, where it can be lawfully downloaded.
  • Captions, comments and accompanying threats.
  • Screenshots showing personal information being disclosed.
  • Evidence of repeated posts or contact.
  • Relevant messages or correspondence.

Where appropriate, use an authorised organisational account or approved evidence-preservation process.

Do not instruct employees to use personal accounts to engage with harmful material.

Preserve original files and available metadata where possible.

Avoid altering, cropping or editing the original evidence. Additional working copies may be made where appropriate, provided the original remains intact.

Record who collected the evidence, when it was collected and where it is stored.

Access should be restricted to authorised personnel.

Important: Do not delay contacting the police or obtaining urgent assistance simply to collect evidence.

Step 3: Assess the Nature of the Publication

Managers should consider whether the content involves:

  • Threats of violence.
  • Harassment or repeated intimidation.
  • Stalking or unwanted contact.
  • Disclosure of an employee's private information, sometimes called doxxing.
  • Encouragement for others to identify, locate or confront an employee.
  • Racist, sexual or other discriminatory abuse.
  • False allegations accompanied by threats or intimidation.
  • Manipulated images, audio or video.
  • Attempts to identify an employee's home or family.
  • Publication of confidential information.
  • A developing risk to other employees or service users.

Not every unpleasant comment, criticism or edited recording constitutes a criminal offence.

The response should be proportionate to the circumstances, the evidence and the identified risks.

Where the legal position is uncertain, seek appropriate specialist advice.

Step 4: Consider Police Involvement

Where material contains credible threats, suspected stalking, harassment, incitement to violence or other potentially criminal behaviour, contact the police.

Use 999 where there is an immediate emergency in the United Kingdom.

Use 101 or the relevant police reporting arrangements for non-emergency concerns.

For organisations operating in the Republic of Ireland, follow the appropriate Garda reporting arrangements.

Provide the available evidence and explain why the publication creates concern for employee safety.

Where the police are involved, establish whether contacting the uploader or requesting removal could affect an investigation.

Record the police reference number and any advice received.

Step 5: Report the Material to the Online Platform

An authorised manager should report harmful content using the relevant platform's reporting procedures.

Select the most appropriate category, such as:

  • Threats or violence.
  • Harassment or bullying.
  • Stalking or intimidation.
  • Disclosure of private information.
  • Impersonation.
  • Manipulated or misleading content, where the platform provides this category.

Explain the concern clearly and provide the information requested by the platform.

Retain screenshots of the report, confirmation messages and reference numbers.

Where the platform refuses removal, consider whether a further review or appeal is available.

Do not assume that every disputed recording will be removed.

Step 6: Consider a Formal Removal Request

Where the person responsible for uploading the material is known, an authorised manager may consider making a formal written request for removal.

This should only happen after assessing:

  • Whether contacting the person could escalate the situation.
  • Whether there is an ongoing police investigation.
  • Whether the organisation has a sound legal or contractual basis for the request.
  • Whether the request could interfere with legitimate complaints, evidence preservation or lawful expression.
  • Whether legal or information governance advice is needed.

The employee affected should not be expected to contact the uploader personally.

Any request should be professional, factual and proportionate.

It should identify the material, explain the concern and request removal or another appropriate remedy.

Do not threaten automatic eviction, arrest or prosecution.

Do not claim that all filming without consent is unlawful.

Retain a copy of the correspondence and any response.

Step 7: Support the Employee

Online targeting can cause considerable distress, particularly where employees are identifiable or family members are mentioned.

Managers should consider:

  • Immediate welfare and reassurance.
  • Whether the employee feels safe attending work.
  • Changes to visiting or lone working arrangements.
  • Support through occupational health or employee assistance services.
  • Assistance reviewing exposed personal information.
  • Whether colleagues should be warned about a credible threat.
  • Appropriate follow-up and incident review.

Avoid placing responsibility on the employee for being targeted.

Step 8: Record, Review and Follow Up

The organisation should maintain a clear record of:

  • What was published and where.
  • When the organisation became aware.
  • Who was affected.
  • Evidence preserved.
  • Risks identified.
  • Police reports and reference numbers.
  • Platform reports and outcomes.
  • Any contact with the uploader.
  • Support provided to the employee.
  • Changes to risk assessments or working arrangements.
  • Outstanding actions and review dates.

Consider whether the incident identifies wider weaknesses in staff identification, public correspondence, social media exposure, information security or workplace violence procedures.

Where relevant, refer to the Safety Hub guide Protecting Staff from Online Targeting and Harassment.

When Employees Suspect They Are Being Recorded

Employees should not assume that a person is acting unlawfully simply because they are recording.

Where recording creates a legitimate concern, staff may calmly explain the organisation's procedures and ask about the purpose of the recording.

They should avoid confrontation and should not seize, damage or attempt to delete another person's recording equipment.

If the circumstances create a genuine safety concern, employees should follow their risk assessment, seek assistance or withdraw.

Recording alone should not automatically be described as harassment, a criminal offence or a breach of tenancy.

Employer Action Guide

Organisations can download a free practical guide and adaptable workplace policy for managing recordings, protecting employees and responding when harmful material is shared online.

When Staff Are Filmed or Recorded: An Employer's Action Guide

The Word and PDF versions include evidence preservation, reporting procedures, employee protection and a manager's action checklist. The policy must be reviewed and adapted before it is adopted.

Training

Being recorded can add pressure to an already difficult encounter, particularly when someone appears to be trying to provoke a reaction.

Employees also need to recognise that modern recording technology may be present without an obvious camera or phone being held in front of them.

Our Conflict Management and Lone Worker Personal Safety training helps staff recognise warning signs, communicate professionally, maintain appropriate boundaries and know when to seek assistance or withdraw.

Where relevant to the client's working environment, training can include discussion of doorbell cameras, smart devices, covert recording concerns, livestreaming and online targeting.

Practical scenarios can also explore how staff should respond when someone publishes an edited or misleading recording.

Training should reflect the organisation's procedures and does not replace legal advice, appropriate risk assessments or management support following an incident.

Official sources used for this page

Published 18 July 2026. Source review for this revised material: 6 November 2026. Next review 1 January 2027, or sooner if data-protection or employment rules change. Not legal advice.

This page is not legal advice. It does not decide liability, guilt, or the outcome of any particular case.

The law changes. A published or source-check date is not a promise that every later change has been caught. On the day you rely on this page, check the named statute, regulations and official sources. For UK law, start with legislation.gov.uk and the regulator named on this page. For the Republic of Ireland, start with the Irish revised Acts and the named Irish regulator.

Duties on this page apply only in the nations named here. Do not copy England or Wales wording onto Scotland, Northern Ireland or Ireland unless this page says that duty extends there.

Return to the start of this guide

Plan training around your staff and risks

Tell us about your staff roles, working environment and the situations your staff face. We will recommend the right training approach for your organisation.

Trusted by organisations across the UK for practical, scenario-led staff safety training.